"The product is defined well enough to build — and I want the build focused on the version we've actually authorized."
Accept the authorized build, revise, defer launch, redirect, or stop — with an explicit launch-readiness handoff either way.
We realize the authorized product scope to agreed acceptance criteria, with explicit ownership, change control, quality evidence, and handoff. Implementation activity doesn't get to redefine the product by default.
A fit when: an accepted Product Definition and build authorization exist — scope, exclusions, acceptance criteria, constraints, dependencies, and owner are explicit.
Not a fit when: the definition is inadequate (return to Define), a specialist should own the delivery outcome, or budget, authority, or risk controls are incompatible.
A build plan and work package · the implemented authorized scope · decision and change records · acceptance evidence · a defect and exception record · operating and support notes · a launch-readiness package.
The build follows an accepted definition and authorization boundary. Scope changes are decisions with records — not drift.
An implementation commitment tied to explicit authorized scope and a change-control model — commercial form follows the mandate.
Your launch — by you or with separately authorized launch support, including a pre-launch Launch Review — bounded revision, third-party operations, defer, or stop. Build does not automatically authorize Launch.
Senior delivery judgment and a build whose decisions, acceptance evidence, and exceptions are inspectable throughout — not just at demo day.
Build the defined next step See if this fits your situation